Smoke alarms, strange dreams and mother’s day Cold temperatures and Baz

The Chief Turnip resigns and Cyclone Katy becomes a full-strength cyclone

May 9th, 2011 at 03:41pm

At long, long last, Canberra has been saved from the wrath of Chief Turnip Jon Stanhope. Stanhope resigned today, leaving the cyclonic one in his wake.

ACT chief minister Jon Stanhope is retiring.

Australia’s longest serving government leader, who turned 60 last month, was elected to the top post in November 2001.

Which would make his tenure ten years…so not the longest, but anyway, we continue…

Mr Stanhope described the jobs as a privilege.

“I would like to thank the people of Canberra for the opportunity they’ve given me to represent them,” he told reporters on Monday.

“I consider it a privilege to have been granted this role.”

He also thanked his successor Katy Gallagher for her unstinting support and friendship.

“I quite simply could not have more faith in Katy’s capacity,” he says.

Mr Stanhope thanked voters in his ACT electorate on Ginninderra, in northern Canberra, where he lives with his wife Robyn.

“I particularly acknowledge and express my deep gratitude to the people of Belconnen and my electorate of Ginninderra, the community which Robyn and I have lived for the last 37 years and where we brought up our children,” he says.

The same people he told to be quiet when he was talking to them at Belconnen Mall because they were silly and didn’t understand the issues? Well I suppose they did vote for him…I will never understand why.

Anyway, the article just gets stranger from there. We start with Stanhope’s bizarre dreams (and you thought mine were odd).

“I’m confident that with the splendid leadership which Katy can provide, the territory … will ultimately achieve if not statehood, constitutional equality with the states.”

Will never happen, and rightly so. We are a territory of the federal government based on land which originally belonged to New South Wales. A decent chunk of our land is controlled through a love/hate relationship between the federal government’s National Capital Authority and our own Legislative Assembly. Realistically we should have one or two local councils running our territory rather than the psuedo-state government that we do have…maybe then we wouldn’t have a grossly oversized public service of the ACT Government, assisting them to do wasteful jobs which should never have been done by them anyway.

And then the article continues…apparently Jon wants to hang on to the one thing which worked well for him during his time at the top.

Mr Stanhope acknowledged many Canberrans were still coming to terms with the 2003 bushfires, which killed four people and destroyed about 500 homes.

“The government, I believe, responded well in the face of this crisis,” he says.

On the day…well no, they were slow to act when they knew the threat was coming. We had the whole debacle of them driving to the Nolan Gallery to save paintings long before they even bothered to tell Canberrans that something might be wrong. The media were on the ball that day, the emergency services did what they could, but the government was found wanting. Still, on the back of the publicity which Jon Stanhope got for jumping out of a helicopter and saving a drowning man around that time, and his supposed decisiveness on the day (we only found out later how big a lie that was), he was popular for quite some time.

Stanhope’s government has been riddled with budgetary mismanagement, incredible delays, his trademark “consultation” process where he talks to nobody and makes his own decision (decisiveness is good, pretending to consult and then blaming everyone else for the eventual mess is not), and a gazillion public artworks which are completely unnecessary and an eyesore to boot.

On Facebook, 2CC have asked “Should we commission a piece of art to honour the work of ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope?”. My answer sums up what I think of Stanhope’s reign of terror. “No, we should pull down all the ones he put up and send him the bill for their removal, and perhaps for their original construction as well.”

I’m not really looking forward to having Cyclone Katy as Chief Minister (the turnip badge is reserved for Stanhope)…but at least now that we have the inexplicably popular Stanhope out of the way, Canberra might, maybe, perhaps, if we’re lucky, see fit to elect Zed Seselja and his far more competent team to clean up the mess next year. One can hope.


Entry Filed under: Canberra Stories,General News,Samuel's Editorials

Print This Post Print This Post


  • 1. padders  |  May 9th, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    For some reason Blogger is playing silly buggers and I can’t post anything. Well, yes, ACT Cheif idiot has resigned. Thought the day would never come. I heard Zed Seselja say that the master of monotone was “the most capable” person in ACT Labor – which doesn’t say much for the rest of them. I hear we might not be rid of Nohope just yet – is it true that he is considering a move to Federal politics? He won’t know what hit him. Come to think of it, neither will Federal politics!

  • 2. Samuel  |  May 9th, 2011 at 4:45 pm

    I’m not sure about his aspirations on the national stage, but I can picture him getting a senate seat. Of course the senate would then have somebody to compete with the real prime minister, Bob Green of the Browns, for the title of most boring and monotonous person to inhabit the chamber.

    Zed’s probably right, although Ted Quinlan did strike me as being a capable person…I think that’s why he quit, because the others wouldn’t listen when he told them that they were headed for budgetary oblivion.

    Katy has destroyed almost everything she has touched, so she will be in for a big shock without Jon there to guide her. So the next question is who will be the Deputy Disaster, Simon or Andrew? Either way, we’re doomed…slightly less doomed with Simon as it takes him longer to break things…or does it just seem like it takes longer because he learnt boredom techniques from Jon?

    What odds would you give on Jon Stanhope using his trademark intermittent outbursts to start a career as the new Mark Latham, ranting and raving about the failings of the Labor Party?

  • 3. padders  |  May 9th, 2011 at 5:19 pm

    What odds? Long ones. I very much doubt Stanhope will become the next Mark Latham. Latham was of the NSW right which, I would like to think, saw him better-attuned to the problems of the community and the failings of his own party. The isn’t a skerrick of right-wing in Stanhope, and, although he can blast his Ferdeal ALP colleagues every now and then, most people recongise his rantings as those of a hard left ideolgue. He is a doctrinaire socialist, if ever there was one, and I would be astonished if he ever ratted on the party that promoted him to his own level of incompetence.


May 2011

Most Recent Posts

Search Blog or Web


Ads By Google

Blix Theme by Sebastian Schmieg and modified for Samuel's Blog by Samuel Gordon-Stewart.
Printing CSS with the help of Martin Pot's guide to Web Page Printability With CSS.
Icons by Kevin Potts.
Powered by WordPress.
Log in